新西兰亚洲研究本科预科作业-Defining Nations in Asia and Europe A comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration

新西兰亚洲研究本科预科essay-Defining Nations in Asia and Europe A comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration Policy

 

 

Written by John Skrentny, Stehanie Chan, John E. Fox, and Denis Kim

 

 

Skrentny, John; Stephanie Chan; Jon E. Fox; and Denis Kim. “Defining Nations in Asia and Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration Policy”. International Migration Review 41, no.4 (2007): 44-72. Accessed April 26, 2012. 

 

 

 

Summary:

 

 

The debates raised by co-ethnics in recent years is really a difficult issue from Asia to Europe, and different countries have different policies to handle it, such as Japan, South Korean and China in Asia or German ,Poland and Romania in Europe. Each country has enforced its own immigration and citizenship policy to manage its labor markets to promote social development and perfect its social and economical environment. Otherwise, there are much more differences between east-Asian and north-European regions. On one hand, the country in east-Asia much emphasizes the economy’s development while north-European lies in cultural aspects , on the other hand, immigrations in fact are totally distinguished by government’s lawmaking in Asia than that in Europe, where the government usually views co-ethnics as their citizens to protect their legal rights when founding them under ill-treated in overseas or abroad . What is more, the returned immigrations to their ancestry’s country are easier suffered to look down by local people in east-Asia, especially in Korean Chinese in South Korean , and as for those who went to their ancestry’s country almost working on 3D ( dirty, dangerous, and difficult) jobs, but European preferences are a kind of expressive nationalism.通过有限伦理近年来提出的辩论是从亚洲到欧洲的一个困难的问题，不同的国家有不同的政策来处理，如日本，韩国和中国在亚洲和欧洲的德国，波兰和罗马尼亚。每个国家都有它自己的移民和公民政策执行管理其劳动力市场，促进社会的发展和完善的社会和经济环境。否则，在东亚和欧洲北部地区之间的差异更。一方面，东亚国家更强调经济的发展而北欧洲在于文化方面，另一方面，移民实际上是完全区分政府的立法在亚洲比欧洲，那里的政府通常的看法有限伦理为其公民为维护自己的合法权益，在建立他们生病在国外或国外治疗下。更甚的是，返回的移民祖先的国家更容易遭受往下看，在东亚的当地人，尤其是在韩国的朝鲜族，还有那些谁去他们的祖先的国家几乎在三维（肮脏，危险和困难的工作，但是，）是一种欧洲的偏好民族主义的表现。#p#分页标题#e#

 

 

Question:

1.In this paper we argue that comparative analysis shows both significant similarities and differences between two regions, but there are much more concerns about similarities taking the aspects of economy into account . Thus far we have to recognize that every country has rights to meet its needs first, so my question is what strategy can we have in co-operation with each other in our modern times?

2.Another question we must carefully think before twice, in other words, what is the essence of modern country ? On the basis of this point we also need to redefine what the nation really is ?