英国经济学论文:对经济价值、现金流量折现法和鼓励贴现法的比较
时间:2013-07-30 14:51:53 来源:www.ukthesis.org 作者:英国论文网 点击:122次
The comparison among Economic Value Added (EVA), Discount Cash Flow (DCF) and Dividend Discount Method (DDM)
Before the investors begin to invest into one project, they will usually make an assessment in order to decide whether to put money in or not. Currently, all the financial institution or banks adapt three methods; they are EVA, DCF, and DDM. As calculation of these three methods are based on different input data and assumptions from different aspects, so when people use any one of these three methods, sometimes will obtain the adverse conclusion. Like Alex Faseruk said: “the existence of this discrepancy between these models is dizzy.”
DCF
EVA
The comparison among EVA, DCF and DDM
From their points, the time value of cash should be considered priory, it means that all the future cash flow must be estimated and discounted by their present value, and the sum of all the cash flow, whatever the incomings and outgoings, the amount of all the cash flow is NPV (net present value). If NPV is positive, it reflect that this project could be invested because the revenue is high than the costs, investors acquire the profits, and vice verse. In DCF model, how to judge the discount rate is the key point, because it decides the model success or not. Jaime Sabal made a point in his article “WACC OR APV”. He said, basically, people usually use the WACC (Weighted average cost of capital) as the discount rate in DCF model, which reflects two parts of the cash flows;
1. the time value of money (risk-free rate) – according to the theory of time preference, investors would rather have cash immediately than having to wait and must therefore be compensated by paying for the delay. So that is the reason why DCF model is used widely, because it is a comprehensive method. DCF model adapt WACC as discount rate, it considers all the influence which bring by different aspects, include impact from equity, debt etc. Due to the combination of all the factors, using WACC could more precisely to value the return rate of investment than other models. Ben McClure, the director of McClure & Co said, instead of trying to come up with a fair value stock price, investors can plug the company's current stock price into the DCF model and, working backwards, calculate how quickly the company would have to grow its cash flows to achieve the stock price. DCF analysis can help investors identify where the company's value is coming from and whether or not its current share price is justified.#p#分页标题#e# But free cash flow is difficult and volatile to measure. Michel Habib, and Rudolf Volkart in his text (From Cash Flows to Accounting Numbers in Valuation) said: In many cases, the only discipline imposed on the person estimating the cash flows is self-discipline, especially when estimating cash flows in the distant future. Given the difficulty of forecasting far into the future, some constant rate of growth in cash flows must be assumed beyond some future year. In general, valuations are extremely sensitive to this growth rate, which by necessity is assumed to go on forever, this naturally dents the credibility of DCF valuations. It represent that in the DCF model any small changes in inputs can result in large changes in the value of a company. Because in the long term, the inputs that produce these valuations are always changing and DCF model will susceptible to error. Like people always said: “garbage in, garbage out”. A single, unexpected event can immediately make a DCF model obsolete. For example, using DCF to analyze commercial real estate during any but the early years of a boom market will lead to overvaluation of the asset.48 Furthermore, with its focus on long-range investing; the DCF model isn't suited for short-term investments.
|